Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role > 자유게시판

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites providing both complimentary casino-style games and profitable rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to discuss claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings in 2015 alone. Now the business deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New York suit that claims VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'develop a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of stars from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences in between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes casinos found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads typically center around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The disparity in between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never purchase,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'

Social gambling establishments use consumers an opportunity to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to unlock numerous functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting clients to acquire other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but 7 states, which has assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don't require generally need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thereby providing a reason to attempt their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial distinction between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting sites like casinos.'

Think about the way that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that provide them the opportunity to win rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not meet the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all kinds of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of sports betting industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're typically not tied to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the attributes commonly related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payment percentage for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the income made by the company [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, offering consumers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have considering that been shuttered over claims of unlawful sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should face comparable examination.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for unlawful sports betting.'

One of the gambling establishment industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are forgoing considerable tax and profits chances as this sports betting replaces that carried out through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent lawsuit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We normally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and stay positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just excellent video games, user experiences and entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively common throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to intensely safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The issues in between conventional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong stance against unlawful gambling - particularly when to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting supposedly prohibited gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to explain to consumers the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious unlawful gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at danger along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton